From: Ingo Oeser <ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>
To: Jonathan Lundell <linux@lundell-bros.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
Kimball Brown <kimball@serverworks.com>,
davej@codemonkey.org.uk, torvalds@transmeta.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tighten up serverworks workaround.
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:14:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030227131406.Q629@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p05210508ba82bc0ea504@[207.213.214.37]>; from linux@lundell-bros.com on Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:47:52AM -0800
Hello there,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:47:52AM -0800, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> At 1:03pm -0500 2/26/03, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > How can e help? Please give me a configuration and how the bug manifests
> >> inself.
> >
> >OSB4 chipset system, some memory areas marked write combining with the
> >processor memory type range registers. A long time ago Dell (I
> >think) reported corruption from this and submitted changes to block the
> >use of write combining on OSB4. The question has arisen as to whether
> >thats a known thing, and if so which release of the chipset fixed it so that
> >people can only apply such a restriction to problem cases not all OSB4.
>
> Presumably we're talking about CNB30 (the north bridge) rather than
> OSB4 (the south bridge).
No it's about CNB20LE. I'm one of the low performance victims.
And this is an ASUS board (CUR-DLS) (which proved not worth its
prices recently).
Regards
Ingo Oeser
--
Science is what we can tell a computer. Art is everything else. --- D.E.Knuth
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-27 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-26 13:49 davej
2003-02-26 16:27 ` Alan Cox
2003-02-26 16:29 ` Dave Jones
2003-02-26 16:36 ` Alan Cox
2003-02-26 17:27 ` Kimball Brown
2003-02-26 18:03 ` Alan Cox
2003-02-26 18:47 ` Jonathan Lundell
2003-02-27 12:14 ` Ingo Oeser [this message]
2003-03-03 9:03 ` Mike A. Harris
2003-03-03 10:45 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-03-03 12:02 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-03 12:46 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-03-03 14:42 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030227131406.Q629@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de \
--to=ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=kimball@serverworks.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@lundell-bros.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®