From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:13:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:13:28 -0500 Received: from adsl-67-121-154-32.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net ([67.121.154.32]:2528 "EHLO triplehelix.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:13:15 -0500 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:23:05 -0800 To: Alex Riesen Cc: linux-kernel mailing list Subject: Re: 2.4.20-ck4 Message-ID: <20030228232305.GA10477@triplehelix.org> References: <200302281545.01222.kernel@kolivas.org> <20030228124314.GS5239@riesen-pc.gr05.synopsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030228124314.GS5239@riesen-pc.gr05.synopsys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i From: Joshua Kwan Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 01:43:14PM +0100, Alex Riesen wrote: > You do not include ALSA anymore. Is that just because of lack of time, > or did i miss some serious problem with it? I believe Con did it because the ALSA in his patchset was woefully=20 outdated and it was more useful to just point people to alsa-project.org=20 ;) The ALSA in -ck2 was 0.9.0rc2; at the time, rc4 was out, for example. HTH, Josh --=20 New PGP public key: 0x27AFC3EE --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+X+9ZT2bz5yevw+4RAoG2AJ0Se5tJwtFg+W9iGjcnmYBtpIY60wCgpIZ+ Kjh5TSzYHwv0mTI5Zgho7F4= =YZsz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc--