From: "Jared Daniel J. Smith" <linux@trios.org>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel source spellchecker
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 10:56:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030302165127Z269240-29902+1551@vger.kernel.org> (raw)
Regarding these two cautious comments:
==========================================================================
I wouldn't go that far. Better give a list of speling mistakes (file/line)
and fix them by hand. It won't need to be done more than occasionally, so
the overhead is not too bad. --Dr. Horst H. von Brand
It might also be worth adding a list of 'suspect' spellings -- which
require human intervention. Such items might include 'indices=indexes'
and 'erratum=errata' although you can't do it automatically because
sometimes the right-hand side is actually correct. --David Woodhouse
==========================================================================
I fully agree.
I have tried to automatically spell-check long, complex texts for years,
with numerous algorithms; all of them fail for one reason or another,
and I find that the only proper way to do it is the tedious work by hand.
Even a single lost pun because of overenthusiastic spellchecking is
not worth the cleanup. I would prefer to see typos than lose a single
intentional 'misspelling'. It would be best if you posted all changes
somewhere so that they could be verified manually.
Consider the following:
alignment=alignement
alignmement is French; is this intentional?
constants=konstants
konstants is German; is this intentional?
consumer=comsumer
comsumer is a neologism: http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue5_5/henshall/
Converted=Coverted
is it a pun on something 'hidden' or is it something transformed?
descriptor=decriptor,desciptor
is it descriptor or decrypter?
invocation=invokation
invokation is German; is this intentional?
negative=negativ
negativ is a legitimate non-English word; is this intentional?
signaled=signalled
signaling=Signalling
signaling=signalling
signalled is a legitimate alternate spelling of signaled.
succeeded=succeded
succeded could also be a typo for 'succeed'
through=throught,throuth
throught could also be a typo for 'thought'
writable=writeable
writeable is a legitimate alternate spelling of writable
Thank you,
-Jared
next reply other threads:[~2003-03-02 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-02 18:56 Jared Daniel J. Smith [this message]
2003-03-02 17:22 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2003-03-02 17:47 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-03-02 18:28 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2003-03-02 18:46 ` Steven Cole
2003-03-02 22:32 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-03 3:42 ` [PATCH] 2.5.63-current fix Coverted -> Converted , was (Re: [PATCH] kernel source spellchecker) Steven Cole
[not found] <20030301160017$56fc@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-03-01 18:39 ` [PATCH] kernel source spellchecker Pascal Schmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-01 15:57 shaheed
2003-03-01 16:35 ` Jörn Engel
2003-03-01 18:01 ` shaheed
2003-03-01 18:31 ` Jörn Engel
2003-03-05 18:10 ` Pavel Machek
2003-02-27 6:59 Dan Kegel
[not found] ` <1046330232.15763.97.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2003-03-01 5:38 ` Dan Kegel
2003-03-01 14:11 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-03-01 17:13 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-03-01 18:54 ` Dan Kegel
2003-03-01 19:18 ` Steven Cole
2003-03-01 21:20 ` Dan Kegel
2003-03-02 3:45 ` jw schultz
2003-03-02 2:08 ` Dan Kegel
2003-03-02 3:02 ` Dan Kegel
2003-03-02 3:54 ` Steven Cole
2003-03-02 8:04 ` Dan Kegel
2003-03-02 4:16 ` Steven Cole
2003-03-02 8:21 ` Dan Kegel
2003-03-02 8:40 ` jw schultz
2003-03-02 11:21 ` David Woodhouse
2003-03-02 13:49 ` Steven Cole
2003-03-02 14:55 ` David Woodhouse
2003-03-02 22:44 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-02 22:59 ` John Bradford
2003-03-03 2:29 ` Dan Kegel
[not found] ` <3E62C0FF.1090700@kegel.com>
[not found] ` <1046661777.7527.518.camel@spc1.mesatop.com>
2003-03-03 5:36 ` Dan Kegel
[not found] ` <3E62E4C0.9070103@kegel.com>
[not found] ` <1046668274.7527.533.camel@spc1.mesatop.com>
2003-03-03 5:48 ` Dan Kegel
2003-03-02 15:35 ` Dan Kegel
2003-03-02 8:09 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-03-02 8:13 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-03-02 3:29 ` Steven Cole
2003-03-01 19:30 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-03-01 20:33 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-03-01 21:25 ` Dan Kegel
2003-03-01 21:25 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-03-02 9:15 ` John Bradford
2003-03-02 9:31 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-03-02 3:16 ` Horst von Brand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030302165127Z269240-29902+1551@vger.kernel.org \
--to=linux@trios.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®