From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 12:48:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 12:48:18 -0500 Received: from phoenix.mvhi.com ([195.224.96.167]:24073 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 12:48:17 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:58:44 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Andrew Walrond Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5-bk menuconfig format problem Message-ID: <20030303175844.A29121@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Walrond , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3E637196.8030708@walrond.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3E637196.8030708@walrond.org>; from andrew@walrond.org on Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:15:34PM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:15:34PM +0000, Andrew Walrond wrote: > Just done a pull and now the first entry of make menuconfig is: > > [*] Support for paging of anonymous memory > > It shouldn't really be there, should it? Why not? Even if you never want to use a swapless kernel there's still plenty use for it.