From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Subject: Patches, effort, motivation
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:17:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030313131728.A4861@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
Hi,
I'm getting to the point of completely giving up kernel development
outside the ARM tree, which basically means leaving serial, pci, and
pcmcia to other people.
I have been trying for the last 5 days to get Linus to accept two
patches small patches:
1. a patch to register tty_devclass using postcore_initcall().
This is necessary before I can push the next set of serial changes.
Without it, the serial layer will oops in sysfs when it tries to
register drivers.
2. a patch to restore the PCI device probing, so we don't probe
all functions when we discover that function 0 is not present.
This is the behaviour we had prior to 2.5.64.
Both of these patches have been sent to Linus several times over the
past 5 days, and each time they have been completely ignored without
explaination.
I have a huge pile of patches backing up here. I'm at the point where
I'm going to give up updating them to bk-curr, and testing them before
sending each to Linus due to the number of patches. Going around this
loop just takes too much of my time to make it worth while.
My backlog currently consists of:
8 PCI patches (1 needs to be further cut up)
10 PCMCIA patches (1 needs to be further cut up)
1 tty_io.c patch
16 serial csets
there are some dependencies between these patches, and getting the stuff
applied in the right order is absolutely paramount to ensure that things
don't break.
So, any suggestions on how to handle this better, and above all get Linus
to start applying stuff?
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
next reply other threads:[~2003-03-13 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-13 13:17 Russell King [this message]
2003-03-13 15:39 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030313131728.A4861@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®