From: Srihari Vijayaraghavan <harisri@bigpond.com>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Request for help - tcpdump on many ethernet cards simulateneously
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 00:51:19 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200303140051.19453.harisri@bigpond.com> (raw)
Hello,
I have a requirement to capture network traffic on 5 Fast Ethernet cards
simultaneously and store it in the local file system using tcpdump utility
(3.7.2 Latest).
I ran some initial tests on RH 2.4.9 based kernel on a test machine with:
2 Xeon 2.8 GHz/512 KB Cache
1 GB RAM
U160 10K SCSI drives on Hardware RAID 1 under Compaq SmartArray controller
(cciss.o)
4 Intel Ether Expro 100 Tx cards (eepro100.o), 1 Broadcom Gigabit (tg3.o)
All connected to a Cisco Fast Ethernet Switch (100 Tx only)
I captured approx 3 million packets of 1500 bytes on each adapter
simultaneously over a period few minutes (it takes about 10 secs to fill up
approx 500 MB in the EXT2 file system). During this period CPU (nearly 100%
utilised), Memory (only few megabytes remained as free, rest all occupied by
cache/buffer) and IO were really busy. The tcpdump utility reported that
kernel hasn't dropped a single packet in that duration, which is a good news.
Is there anyone out there who has done similar work and would like to share
the knowledge about:
1. Kernel version
2. File system used (parameters if any)
3. Network card and driver
4. SCSI/HW RAID controller card and driver
5. Tunning parameters for any sub-system if any
6. Any advise in general (don't use more than 1 GB RAM, use XFS, use aa/rmap,
use 2.5 :-) etc..)
What I am really worried about is kernel may start dropping the packets after
few hours/days and/or tcpdump/kernel may not be able to keep up with the
network load due to IO load on the hard drives, memory pressure etc..
Are there any known bad effects on a 4 GB RAM configuration? (the production
system will have 4 GB RAM)
By tomorrow I will have the opportunity to run it for few hours and see if it
misbehaves (on 2.4.18-RH-latest and 2.4.20/21-pre. -aa if possible). I could
also capture vmstat etc..
Thanks for your help.
--
Hari
harisri@bigpond.com
next reply other threads:[~2003-03-13 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-13 13:51 Srihari Vijayaraghavan [this message]
2003-03-13 14:25 ` Torsten Foertsch
2003-03-13 14:28 ` OFFTOPIC: " uaca
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200303140051.19453.harisri@bigpond.com \
--to=harisri@bigpond.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®