From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:47:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:47:03 -0500 Received: from 12-231-249-244.client.attbi.com ([12.231.249.244]:28176 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:47:02 -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 13:46:23 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Vojtech Pavlik Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c driver changes for 2.5.64 Message-ID: <20030315214623.GB13446@kroah.com> References: <10476033263399@kroah.com> <10476033262095@kroah.com> <20030315104901.A3923@ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030315104901.A3923@ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 10:49:01AM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 04:55:00PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > static struct pci_driver amd8111_driver = { > > - .name = "amd8111 smbus 2.0", > > + .name = "amd8111 smbus", > > The 2.0 was quite intentional in the .name, because the 8111 has *two* > SMBus busses, one SMBus 1.1 and one SMBus 2.0. This driver is only for > the 2.0 SMBus controller. Ah, I removed the "2.0" portion because it was larger than the 16 character limit for pci driver names (it shows up in sysfs garbled if it's bigger). Would "amd8111 smbus 2" be an ok name? thanks, greg k-h