From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:56:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:56:10 -0500 Received: from twilight.ucw.cz ([81.30.235.3]:3783 "EHLO twilight.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:56:07 -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 23:06:42 +0100 From: Vojtech Pavlik To: Greg KH Cc: Vojtech Pavlik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c driver changes for 2.5.64 Message-ID: <20030315230642.A14115@ucw.cz> References: <10476033263399@kroah.com> <10476033262095@kroah.com> <20030315104901.A3923@ucw.cz> <20030315214623.GB13446@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20030315214623.GB13446@kroah.com>; from greg@kroah.com on Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 01:46:23PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 01:46:23PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 10:49:01AM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 04:55:00PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > static struct pci_driver amd8111_driver = { > > > - .name = "amd8111 smbus 2.0", > > > + .name = "amd8111 smbus", > > > > The 2.0 was quite intentional in the .name, because the 8111 has *two* > > SMBus busses, one SMBus 1.1 and one SMBus 2.0. This driver is only for > > the 2.0 SMBus controller. > > Ah, I removed the "2.0" portion because it was larger than the 16 > character limit for pci driver names (it shows up in sysfs garbled if > it's bigger). > > Would "amd8111 smbus 2" be an ok name? Yes. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs