From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 10:41:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 10:41:29 -0500 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:40926 "EHLO mail.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 10:41:29 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 07:52:20 -0800 From: Larry McVoy Message-Id: <200303171552.h2HFqK907234@work.bitmover.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: BK->CVS is live X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I think those repositories are stable enough you can start to count on them. Sam and others have looked over their changes and think that the CVS tree has accurate data. The CVS repository is at cvs -d:pserver:anonymous@kernel.bkbits.net:/home/cvs and it has two top level directories, linux-2.4 and linux-2.5.