From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 13:09:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 13:09:50 -0500 Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([213.168.176.16]:46976 "EHLO louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 13:09:49 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 19:20:40 +0100 From: Tomas Szepe To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25 Message-ID: <20030317182040.GA2145@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <200303171604.h2HG4Zc30291@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <1047923841.1600.3.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1047923841.1600.3.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > [arjanv@redhat.com] > > I've attached a patch against 2.4.21pre5. So what happens now? Is this critical enough for 2.4.21 to go out? Or can it wait like some other fairly serious stuff such as the ext3 fixes? What about the current state of IDE? Would it make sense to repackage 2.4.20 into something like 2.4.20-p1 or 2.4.20.1 with only the critical stuff applied? -- Tomas Szepe