From: wind@cocodriloo.com
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: wind@cocodriloo.com, bzzz@tmi.comex.ru, riel@surriel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4 vm, program load, page faulting, ...
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 01:12:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030318001210.GH11526@wind.cocodriloo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030317152855.388b643f.akpm@digeo.com>
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 03:28:55PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> wind@cocodriloo.com wrote:
> >
> > > This is all a bit dubious for several reasons. Most particularly, the
> > > up-front instantiation of the pages in pagetables makes unneeded pages harder
> > > to reclaim. It would be really neat if someone could try putting the
> > > madvise(MADV_WILLNEED) into glibc and test that. Maybe on a 2.4 kernel.
> >
> >
> > something like this one?
> >
>
> No, not at all. I meant a patch against glibc, not against the kernel!
>
> Like this:
>
> map = mmap(..., PROT_EXEC, ...);
> + if (getenv("MAP_PREFAULT"))
> + madvise(map, length, MADV_WILLNEED);
I know what you mean, but right now it's far easier hacking the
kernel than libc, at least if running a uml-kernel ;)
Anyways, I booted my patch but I don't know if it's working, because
I've got no test machine to try it on... but, it didn't freak out
so I think it works :)))
As for the libc patch, I think it can be easier to make an
exec-prefault.so library and LD_PRELOAD it, at least for testing
purposes.
If you could tell me the locking is right, I might try patching my
physical machine 2.4.19-ck4 with the kernel patch just to see if it
works.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-18 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-16 4:59 Paul Albrecht
2003-03-17 15:02 ` Rik van Riel
2003-03-17 15:10 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-17 16:01 ` Rik van Riel
2003-03-17 16:52 ` wind
2003-03-17 16:50 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-17 17:12 ` wind-lkml
2003-03-17 17:38 ` wind-lkml
2003-03-17 18:57 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-03-17 19:06 ` wind-lkml
2003-03-17 19:34 ` wind
2003-03-17 22:05 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-17 23:08 ` wind
2003-03-17 23:28 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-18 0:12 ` wind [this message]
2003-03-17 16:37 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-18 7:43 ` Paul Albrecht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030318001210.GH11526@wind.cocodriloo.com \
--to=wind@cocodriloo.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=bzzz@tmi.comex.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®