From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 18:08:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 18:08:21 -0500 Received: from supreme.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.34]:15289 "EHLO pcug.org.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 18:07:51 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 10:18:29 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: sys32_ioctl -> compact_sys_ioctl patches Message-Id: <20030319101829.57266c3b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20030318202524.GA132@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20030318202524.GA132@elf.ucw.cz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:25:24 +0100 Pavel Machek wrote: > > I tried posting ioctl32 patches to Linus several times, and got > nothing back. Linus is busy I guess. I have several patches pending as well. > Patches were tested at x86-64 and sparc64, and general attitude seems > to be "anything that gets code out of ioctl32.c is welcome". Yeah, I get that as well :-) > Do you think you could try to push them through? I'll do my best. Thanks for all the work. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/