Re: [REPORT] 2.5.65-mm1

[Josh McKinney <forming@charter.net>]

On approximately Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 03:58:44AM -0600, Shawn wrote:
> Well, 2.5.65-mm1 trashed all my data... Just kidding.
> 
> Actually, I'm sitting here with a load of over 25, and my gnome2 menus
> go like they're being chased by friggin fire ants. How many cans of
> whoop-ass does linux have to open for crying out loud???
> 
> Almost like anticipatory /menus/! ;) Almost think I hear a *whoosh* as
> I'm plinking around with 20 cpp processes running simultaneously. Nice!
> Damn nice!
> 
> So, I guess this is a subjective interactivity changes report. So, now,
> Performance == Holy sheet!
> 

Just a me too here.  I have been using 2.5-mm kernels for about the last 10 or
12 revisions and I thought it was good when I started but WOW, it is really good
now.  It seems all of the AS bugs have been ironed out as I haven't had any odd
OOPS or hangs, and under even a serious load it still runs like a champ!

Thanks, 
-- 
Josh McKinney		     |	Webmaster: http://joshandangie.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Linux, the choice            | Accept people for what they are --
of a GNU generation     -o)  | completely unacceptable. 
Kernel 2.5.65-mm1        /\  | 
on a Athlon-XP          _\_v | 
                             |