From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 03:19:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 03:19:46 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:45486 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 03:19:44 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 00:29:04 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20030320.002904.73362328.davem@redhat.com> To: chas@locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][ATM] cleanup nicstar, suni and idt77105 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <200303091239.h29CdkGi000928@locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> References: <20030308.130112.09061347.davem@redhat.com> <200303091239.h29CdkGi000928@locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: chas williams Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 07:39:46 -0500 In message <20030308.130112.09061347.davem@redhat.com>,"David S. Miller" writes: >This patch doesn't apply at all, it deletes lines referencing >idt77105_priv_lock but that does not appear in the sources. yes that's my fault. i had an intermediate change i forgot about. this would be the correct diff for idt77105 -- When I reject a patch, I typically just delete everything you sent me, so if you just resend one part of the fixed up patch the rest gets lost. Can you send the correct patch for all three drivers not just the idt77105 parts? It really isn't rocket science to send patches properly. When I say "didn't apply" it means it went to /dev/null and you have to send me a new complete patch.