mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
To: <ifilipau@sussdd.de>,
	"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: read() & close()
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 04:35:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030321122452Z263606-25575+33907@vger.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7A5D4FEED80CD61192F2001083FC1CF9065139@CHARLY>

On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:14:52 +0100, Filipau, Ihar wrote:

>I have/had a simple issue with multi-threaded programs:
>
>one thread is doing blocking read(fd) or poll({fd}) on
>file/socket.
>
>another thread is doing close(fd).
>
>I expected first thread will unblock with some kind
>of error - but nope! It is blocked!
>
>Is it expected behaviour?

	It is impossible to make this work reliably, so *please* don't do 
that. For example, how can you possibly assure that the first thread 
is actually in 'poll' when call 'close'? There is no atomic 'release 
mutex and poll' function.

	So what happens if the system pre-empts the thread right before it 
calls 'poll'. Then you call 'close'. Perhaps next a thread started by 
some library function calls 'socket' and gets the file descriptor you 
just 'close'd. Now your call to 'poll' polls on the *wrong* socket!

	You simply must accept the fact that you cannot free a resource in 
one thread while another thread is or might be using it.

	DS



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-03-21 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-20 14:14 Filipau, Ihar
2003-03-20 15:08 ` bert hubert
2003-03-21 12:35 ` David Schwartz [this message]
2003-03-20 16:09 Kevin Curtis
2003-03-21  8:07 Filipau, Ihar
2003-03-21 13:07 Filipau, Ihar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030321122452Z263606-25575+33907@vger.kernel.org \
    --to=davids@webmaster.com \
    --cc=ifilipau@sussdd.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®