From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 12:52:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 12:52:42 -0500 Received: from snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.62]:9147 "EHLO snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 12:52:41 -0500 Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 13:10:04 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: lmbench results for 2.4 and 2.5 Message-ID: <20030322181004.GB25553@rushmore> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: rwhron@earthlink.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org If someone wants to go through individual lmbench metrics and find regression points, I have some data that I believe is mostly very good. There is lmbench info for a lot of 2.4 and 2.5 kernels in these pages: http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/k6-2-475.html http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/old-k6-2-475.html They are from 2 different Linux OS's, but the same piece of hardware. It would be best not to combine them because of the OS differences. If anyone feels like grabbing any of the data in my web pages and graphing it, feel free to do so. If you have any specific questions or want even more data/background let me know. I'd love for the data to be more useful. There is another page with a slew of quad xeon benchmarks. http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/bigbox.html -- Randy Hron