From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 18:18:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 18:18:32 -0500 Received: from deviant.impure.org.uk ([195.82.120.238]:41117 "EHLO deviant.impure.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 18:18:31 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 00:29:48 +0100 From: Dave Jones To: Felipe Alfaro Solana Cc: LKML Subject: Re: cpufreq isn't supported on 440BX Message-ID: <20030401232948.GB6456@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Felipe Alfaro Solana , LKML References: <1049232042.637.12.camel@teapot> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1049232042.637.12.camel@teapot> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 11:20:43PM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > I think that cpufreq isn't supported for Intel Pentium III Mobile > (Coppermine) processors on Intel 440BX motherboards. Is this true? If > so, are there any plans on getting this support in a foreseable future? Not really unless Intel have a change of tune and release specs. (Or progress is made on the reverse engineering effort) Dave