From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 02:47:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 02:47:24 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:41862 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 02:47:03 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 09:58:22 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Nick Piggin Cc: Con Kolivas , Andrew Morton , linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.66-mm2 with contest Message-ID: <20030402075822.GB2925@suse.de> References: <200304021324.10799.kernel@kolivas.org> <3E8A6227.7080209@cyberone.com.au> <20030402074227.GH901@suse.de> <3E8A97D6.3000603@cyberone.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E8A97D6.3000603@cyberone.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 02 2003, Nick Piggin wrote: > Jens Axboe wrote: > > >On Wed, Apr 02 2003, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > >>Con Kolivas wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Big rise in ctar_load and io_load. Drop in read_load. > >>>(All uniprocessor with IDE and AS elevator). AS tweaks? No obvious > >>>scheduler tweak result changes. > >>> > >>> > >>Thanks Con, > >>I'm a bit busy now, but next week I'll work something out for it. > >>It is most likely to be as-queue_notready-cleanup.patch. I'll > >>wait until after Jens ports his dynamic requests stuff over to > >>mm before I go further. > >> > > > >It is ported, I sent Andrew the patch yesterday. I'm attaching it here > >as well. > > > Thanks for doing that, Jens. Any CPU measurements on the hash > goodness that you did for deadline? Nope none yet, in fact Andrew's profile numbers show very little time spent inside the io scheduler hash as it is. It feels like the right thing to do though, even if the hash doesn't eat that much time. -- Jens Axboe