mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.66-mm2 with contest
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 13:23:43 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200304021324.10799.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Contest benchamarks for 2.5.66-mm2:

no_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.66              3   79      94.9    0.0     0.0     1.00
2.5.66-mm1          3   79      94.9    0.0     0.0     1.00
2.5.66-mm2          3   80      93.8    0.0     0.0     1.00
cacherun:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.66              3   76      98.7    0.0     0.0     0.96
2.5.66-mm1          3   75      100.0   0.0     0.0     0.95
2.5.66-mm2          3   75      100.0   0.0     0.0     0.94
process_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.66              3   241     30.7    311.0   68.0    3.05
2.5.66-mm1          3   240     30.8    295.3   67.9    3.04
2.5.66-mm2          3   239     31.0    295.3   67.8    2.99
ctar_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.66              3   105     74.3    0.0     0.0     1.33
2.5.66-mm1          3   110     70.9    1.0     5.5     1.39
2.5.66-mm2          3   184     42.9    2.0     7.1     2.30
xtar_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.66              3   105     72.4    1.0     3.8     1.33
2.5.66-mm1          3   104     74.0    1.0     3.8     1.32
2.5.66-mm2          3   108     71.3    1.3     4.6     1.35
io_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.66              3   438     17.8    150.4   20.9    5.54
2.5.66-mm1          3   132     58.3    45.8    18.9    1.67
2.5.66-mm2          3   371     21.0    147.9   22.3    4.64
io_other:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.66              3   158     49.4    70.0    27.2    2.00
2.5.66-mm1          3   134     58.2    57.5    23.7    1.70
2.5.66-mm2          3   136     57.4    56.7    22.8    1.70
read_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.66              3   110     70.9    6.2     4.5     1.39
2.5.66-mm1          3   121     65.3    9.2     5.8     1.53
2.5.66-mm2          3   110     71.8    8.4     6.3     1.38
list_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.66              3   97      79.4    0.0     7.2     1.23
2.5.66-mm1          3   97      80.4    0.0     7.2     1.23
2.5.66-mm2          3   96      80.2    0.0     7.3     1.20
mem_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.66              3   112     70.5    64.0    1.8     1.42
2.5.66-mm1          3   104     76.0    54.0    1.9     1.32
2.5.66-mm2          3   109     71.6    57.7    1.8     1.36
dbench_load:
Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.66              3   459     16.6    7.0     56.6    5.81
2.5.66-mm1          3   373     20.4    6.3     50.7    4.72
2.5.66-mm2          3   323     23.2    4.7     51.4    4.04

Big rise in ctar_load and io_load. Drop in read_load.
(All uniprocessor with IDE and AS elevator). AS tweaks? No obvious scheduler 
tweak result changes.

Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+ilfEF6dfvkL3i1gRAhjoAJ48yMQqJ0QTJHuzbpsWsQtgUShmEwCeOz3R
IIgzmANSzpbtSagS9wnHAk8=
=BJqi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


             reply	other threads:[~2003-04-02  3:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-02  3:23 Con Kolivas [this message]
2003-04-02  4:08 ` Nick Piggin
2003-04-02  7:42   ` Jens Axboe
2003-04-02  7:57     ` Nick Piggin
2003-04-02  7:58       ` Jens Axboe
2003-04-02  8:08         ` Nick Piggin
2003-04-02  8:15           ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200304021324.10799.kernel@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®