From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 17:02:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 17:02:56 -0500 Received: from [12.47.58.55] ([12.47.58.55]:15606 "EHLO pao-ex01.pao.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 17:02:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:13:42 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Russell Miller Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: subsystem crashes reboot system? Message-Id: <20030402141342.27c28d01.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <200304021551.04659.rmiller@duskglow.com> References: <200304021149.36511.rmiller@duskglow.com> <20030402135104.4b1acadf.akpm@digeo.com> <200304021551.04659.rmiller@duskglow.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Apr 2003 22:14:15.0223 (UTC) FILETIME=[32641C70:01C2F965] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Russell Miller wrote: > > Any chance of making the dying thread sleep just long enough for syslogd to > write it out to the file, then panic? Since it's an assertion, we have a > little more leeway then in a page fault OOPS, for example. > Yes, that would probably be OK. It won't make anything worse than it already is. hm, the kernel used to panic if schedule() was called from in_interrupt(), but that seems to have been taken out. It's easy enough (and free) to put back in.