From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:10:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:09:59 -0500 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:54185 "EHLO mail.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:09:59 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:21:21 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: BK->CVS notify? Message-ID: <20030402162121.GA17636@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I was moving machines around and for the last day and a half or so the CVS trees weren't getting updated. They should be up to date as of now. Do we need a cvs-updates mailing list which gets notified of updates or do you not care? I'd be interested in knowing how many people are using the CVS trees. One other comment: there was concern that the incremental update would not be as good as a one pass conversion. So far, the one pass and the incremental results are identical, no exceptions. So -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm