From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263499AbTDCTOW (for ); Thu, 3 Apr 2003 14:14:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263493AbTDCTNH (for ); Thu, 3 Apr 2003 14:13:07 -0500 Received: from [12.47.58.55] ([12.47.58.55]:18035 "EHLO pao-ex01.pao.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263485AbTDCTKn (for ); Thu, 3 Apr 2003 14:10:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 11:22:48 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Con Kolivas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.66-mm3 with contest Message-Id: <20030403112248.286e5a85.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <200304032348.48118.kernel@kolivas.org> References: <200304032348.48118.kernel@kolivas.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Apr 2003 19:22:04.0330 (UTC) FILETIME=[4F1CB0A0:01C2FA16] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Con Kolivas wrote: > > Seems these "minor" scheduler tweaks cause major changes to the results with > process load and most of the io based loads taking significantly less time. > There weren't any elevator changes in this one were there? The process_load shift was presumably due to the CPU scheduler change. The others would be due to the reversion of an anticipatory scheduler patch, as-queue_notready-cleanup.patch.