From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S263382AbTDCN0F>; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 08:26:05 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S263385AbTDCN0F>; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 08:26:05 -0500
Received: from kweetal.tue.nl ([131.155.3.6]:29707 "EHLO kweetal.tue.nl")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S263382AbTDCN0D>;
	Thu, 3 Apr 2003 08:26:03 -0500
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 15:37:25 +0200
From: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>, Joel.Becker@oracle.com,
       <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 64-bit kdev_t - just for playing
Message-ID: <20030403133725.GA14027@win.tue.nl>
References: <200303311541.50200.pbadari@us.ibm.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304021413210.12110-100000@serv> <200304020931.38671.pbadari@us.ibm.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304031256550.5042-100000@serv>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304031256550.5042-100000@serv>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 02:13:29PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:

> I am really interested why nobody wants to do now
> that small deciding step to use dynamic dev_t numbers.

Because we first want to have the numbers before using them?