From: Michael Frank <mflt1@micrologica.com.hk>
To: Robert Woerle Paceblade/Support <robert@paceblade.com>
Cc: swsusp@lister.fornax.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Swsusp] internal compiler error
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 21:29:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200304042129.05470.mflt1@micrologica.com.hk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E8D7C65.5050505@paceblade.com>
On Friday 04 April 2003 20:36, Robert Woerle Paceblade/Support wrote:
> now i get this when i try to compile 2.4.20 with any swsusp patch !! (
> tried , beta19 and beta19-14 and beta19-16)
>
> the thing i changed is that i now use Suse 8.2 and before i had suse 8.1
> and everything was fine .
>
> i dont know if there is a gcc differenc between those 2 but it looks
> like !!
>
> Cheers Rob
>
>
>
> cc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.20/include -Wall
> -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common
> -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686
> -malign-functions=0 -malign-jumps=0 -malign-loops=0 -nostdinc
> -iwithprefix include -DKBUILD_BASENAME=sched -fno-omit-frame-pointer -c
> -o sched.o sched.c
> cc1: warning: -malign-loops is obsolete, use -falign-loops
> cc1: warning: -malign-jumps is obsolete, use -falign-jumps
> cc1: warning: -malign-functions is obsolete, use -falign-functions
> sched.c: In function `schedule':
> sched.c:611: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
> sched.c:640: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
> sched.c:709: internal compiler error: in merge_assigned_reloads, at
> reload1.c:6133
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See <URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions.
The obsolete messages point to some gcc-3x. It is no good for kernel compiles because there are many complex tricks in the kernel.
You ought to use gcc2.95-3. You can look for gcc295 compat package and libs at suse site.
Michael
P.S. Official compiler _is_ gcc2.95-3 also for 2.5 series. This is _not_ "obsolete" documentation.
Could someone authoritative from kernel list please confirm that above still applies
parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-04 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <3E8D7C65.5050505@paceblade.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200304042129.05470.mflt1@micrologica.com.hk \
--to=mflt1@micrologica.com.hk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert@paceblade.com \
--cc=swsusp@lister.fornax.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®