mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
To: Mark Hahn <hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: hdparm -tT reports "suspicious results" ???
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 15:21:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200304061523_MC3-1-3348-4760@compuserve.com> (raw)

Mark Hahn wrote:


>does "PII ODP" mean a PII in an adapter that fits into a P6 socket?


It is a factory Intel PII/333 with an HSF that fits in Socket 8.
With its 512K full-speed cache it makes a PPro into a half-decent machine.
Too bad they're so rare...


>> /dev/hde:
>>  Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  2.62 seconds = 48.85 MB/sec
>
> hmm, slower dram and/or FSB.


No, same exact machine in _every_ way, just a different kernel.  It is
slow ECC EDO memory, though.


>> /dev/hde:
>>  Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  2.66 seconds = 48.14 MB/sec
>>  Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  3.90 seconds = 16.41 MB/sec.>
>
> dram is still slow, but disk appears slower yet, so not obviously
> contaminating the measurement.

..and that's 2.5 which measures much lower but doesn't seem to be that

slow (still not tested, I'm testing RAID1 patches on 2.4 now.)


> 53073H4, ecs k7s6a-pro, athlon/"1800", DDR:
> /dev/hda:
>  Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  0.48 seconds =266.67 MB/sec
>  Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  2.04 seconds = 31.37 MB/sec


3 x 33073H3, RAID1, Abit KT7A-RAID, Tbird 1333, PC133 SDRAM:


Personalities : [raid0] [raid1] 
read_ahead 24 sectors
md2 : active raid1 hdg9[0] hde8[2] hda8[1]
      2409600 blocks [3/3] [UUU]

2.4.21-pre6:
/dev/md2:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  0.58 seconds =220.69 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  2.71 seconds = 23.62 MB/sec

2.4.20aa1ce1(unreleased):
/dev/md2:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  0.59 seconds =216.95 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  1.67 seconds = 38.32 MB/sec


I have RAID1 patches that give 55% sequential IO improvements on K7 but
they're not showing the same gains on the PPro (<20% so far.)  Kernel,
chipset, CPU and disk controller are all different, though I expected
to get proportional gains on any hardware.

AFAICT hdparm says "suspicious results" when the disk speed is greater
than one-half the buffer speed.  I just got 51.20 and 26.34 on the PPro
with my patches and the message came out again.

--
 Chuck
 I am not a number!

             reply	other threads:[~2003-04-06 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-06 19:21 Chuck Ebbert [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-06 13:13 Chuck Ebbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200304061523_MC3-1-3348-4760@compuserve.com \
    --to=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
    --cc=hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®