From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262406AbTDFT0M (for <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>); Sun, 6 Apr 2003 15:26:12 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262428AbTDFT0M (for <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>); Sun, 6 Apr 2003 15:26:12 -0400
Received: from siaab2ab.compuserve.com ([149.174.40.130]:2380 "EHLO
	siaab2ab.compuserve.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S262406AbTDFT0K (for <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 6 Apr 2003 15:26:10 -0400
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 15:33:53 -0400
From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
Subject: Re: 2.5.65-preempt booting on 32way NUMAQ
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Message-ID: <200304061537_MC3-1-333E-4B14@compuserve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
	 charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


> I know the tty layer needs work, but as far as I can tell,
> it is SMP issues that preemption exposes...


Hmm, does this mean it's time for the rest of us to try it on uniprocessor
now that the bleeding-edge guys have it working OK on big SMP machines?

  ;)

--
 Chuck
 I am not a number!