From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@au1.ibm.com>,
Fabrice Bellard <fabrice.bellard@free.fr>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Qemu support for PPC
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 16:45:33 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030407064541.4E1312C04E@lists.samba.org> (raw)
In <20030407072144.A28096@infradead.org> you wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 03:09:37PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > Anyway, it's not your call.
>
> if you look at MAINTAINERS I'm responsible for personality handling, so
> maybe it actually _is_ my call?
Which simply shows that an entry in the MAINTAINERS file does not a
maintainer make, since your first post showed such misundestanding of
what personalities do, and you've let the 2.4 and 2.5 personality
lists get out of sync.
Qemu could hack it into all the stat, stat64, open, chmod, chown,
link, rename etc. calls in the emulator, yes, but the in-kernel
solution already exists and is far simpler.
> Because stuff should go into 2.5 first.
I happens, though, whatever you may think. It was done as a 2.4 patch
because there's a tighter time constraint on entry into 2.4.
> And even if it looks trivial there's an important policy decision
> here: do we want to clutter up our personality system for userspace
> emulators? If you look at the current list of personalities they
> all have kernel implementations
This is not qemu specific, of course. If you say it's not going in,
then I'll accept that and do the work inside qemu. It'll be damn
slow, of course.
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
next reply other threads:[~2003-04-07 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-07 6:45 Rusty Russell [this message]
2003-04-07 6:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-04-07 8:34 ` Rusty Russell
2003-04-07 12:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-04-08 1:52 ` Rusty Russell
2003-04-07 11:21 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-09 2:07 ` Rusty Russell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-07 2:40 Rusty Russell
2003-04-07 2:29 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-04-07 5:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-04-07 5:09 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-04-07 6:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-04-07 6:05 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-04-07 11:24 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-07 20:41 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030407064541.4E1312C04E@lists.samba.org \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=fabrice.bellard@free.fr \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=paulus@au1.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®