From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S263284AbTDGGgV (for <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 02:36:21 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263285AbTDGGgV (for <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 02:36:21 -0400
Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:14807 "EHLO lists.samba.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263284AbTDGGgU (for <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 7 Apr 2003 02:36:20 -0400
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: zwane@linuxpower.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com
Subject: SET_MODULE_OWNER?
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 16:47:28 +1000
Message-Id: <20030407064755.DEAD62C06C@lists.samba.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

I thought it was completely useless, hence deprecated.

Anyone have any reason to defend it?
Rusty.
--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.