From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263323AbTDGIG2 (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 04:06:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263322AbTDGIG2 (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 04:06:28 -0400 Received: from dspnet.fr.eu.org ([62.73.5.179]:29191 "EHLO dspnet.fr.eu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263323AbTDGIG0 (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 04:06:26 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 10:18:00 +0200 From: Olivier Galibert To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] new syscall: flink Message-ID: <20030407081800.GA48052@dspnet.fr.eu.org> Mail-Followup-To: Olivier Galibert , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 07:29:35AM +0000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > Can't you just check those permissions, i.e. behave like link() ? > If you cant't access the path to the file, don't permit flink() ? Which path ? A file can have many paths to it, or to the other extreme none at all. OG.