From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263183AbTDGWXd (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 18:23:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263706AbTDGWXd (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 18:23:33 -0400 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.101]:55724 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263183AbTDGWXc convert rfc822-to-8bit (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 18:23:32 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Badari Pulavarty To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: More Testing with 4000 disks Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 14:32:08 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200304071454.49849.pbadari@us.ibm.com> <20030407141551.5900e44f.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030407141551.5900e44f.akpm@digeo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200304071532.08472.pbadari@us.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 07 April 2003 02:15 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > Badari Pulavarty wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here is more on testing with simulated 4000 disks. > > > > I mounted 4000 simulated (scsi_debug) disks. But > > when I tried to do IO on 200 of them (just reads), > > system is 100% busy. Here are the vmstat, > > 10-sec profile output and sysrq-t output. > > > > I am wondering why 100% sys ? > > This doesn't make sense. You're showing 50% CPU time in schedule(), yet > the (undescribed) machine is doing only 11k context switches/sec. Machine is: 8x 900MHz P-III 4GB RAM > > How come? > > What context switch rate and profile were you getting when performing IO > against a large number of real disks? I have only 50 real disks. I can get info on these. Thanks, Badari