From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263447AbTDGOGy (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 10:06:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263438AbTDGOGy (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 10:06:54 -0400 Received: from [80.190.48.67] ([80.190.48.67]:18700 "EHLO mx00.linux-systeme.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263447AbTDGOGy (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 10:06:54 -0400 From: Marc-Christian Petersen Organization: Working Overloaded Linux Kernel To: linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: Interactivity backport to 2.4.20-ck* Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 16:17:56 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <200304072353.47664.kernel@kolivas.org> In-Reply-To: <200304072353.47664.kernel@kolivas.org> Cc: Con Kolivas MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304071617.56106.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 07 April 2003 15:53, Con Kolivas wrote: Hi Con, > I've had numerous requests for a backport of the interactivity changes to > the O(1) scheduler for the -ck* kernels. I have resisted posting my > backport because people had described real problems with these patches. > However it seems most, if not all of the problems are related to one patch. > Get them here: > http://kernel.kolivas.org Why isn't this patch completely backed out from the main O(1) so we can see what is new? ciao, Marc