From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263609AbTDGTSj (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:18:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263610AbTDGTSi (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:18:38 -0400 Received: from remt28.cluster1.charter.net ([209.225.8.38]:43398 "EHLO remt28.cluster1.charter.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263609AbTDGTSh (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:18:37 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:30:07 -0400 To: linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: Interactivity backport to 2.4.20-ck* Message-ID: <20030407193007.GA23077@cy599856-a> Mail-Followup-To: linux kernel mailing list References: <200304072353.47664.kernel@kolivas.org> <200304071617.56106.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> <200304080015.11111.kernel@kolivas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200304080015.11111.kernel@kolivas.org> X-Editor: GNU Emacs 21.1 X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 2.5.66-mm3 i686 X-Processor: Athlon XP 2000+ X-Uptime: 15:07:51 up 23:31, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Josh McKinney Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On approximately Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 12:15:11AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > Why isn't this patch completely backed out from the main O(1) so we can see > > what is new? > > Yeah sure here: > > http://kernel.kolivas.org/scheda3_ck4 > Is this patch supposed to be against ck3? Josh