From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261831AbTDGUgm (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 16:36:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263633AbTDGUgm (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 16:36:42 -0400 Received: from ip68-107-142-198.tc.ph.cox.net ([68.107.142.198]:38034 "EHLO opus.bloom.county") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261831AbTDGUgl (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 16:36:41 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 13:48:12 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: J?rn Engel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New kernel tree for embedded linux Message-ID: <20030407204812.GD17151@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> References: <20030407171037.GB8178@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030407171037.GB8178@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 07:10:37PM +0200, J?rn Engel wrote: > Some days ago, I've started a -je [*] tree which will focus on memory > reduction for the linux kernel. First, I'd like to say please, no, everyone can benefit from _every change_ you want to make in your tree, and it's not just an 'embedded' issue. Second, please look up the archives (this past June -> August maybe?) for the CONFIG_TINY thread. Under that was my TWEAKS idea. If this sounds useful to you, I can try and dig up the last patch I had that got all of the dependancy stuff correct, except that you had to run a command if you changed a TWEAK value. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/