From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263872AbTDHCME (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 22:12:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263876AbTDHCME (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 22:12:04 -0400 Received: from almesberger.net ([63.105.73.239]:22791 "EHLO host.almesberger.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263872AbTDHCMD (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 22:12:03 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 23:23:02 -0300 From: Werner Almesberger To: Andi Kleen Cc: Robert Williamson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aniruddha.marathe@wipro.com, ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: Same syscall is defined to different numbers on 3 different archs(was Re: Makefile issue) Message-ID: <20030407232302.D19288@almesberger.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from ak@suse.de on Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 05:54:39PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi Kleen wrote: > #include /unistd.h> > (you need the version in the kernel source because many glibc packagers > in their infinite wisdom use an old outdated copy of asm/ usually from > the last stable kernel only) Do we need a /proc/syscalls ? :-) - Werner -- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net / /_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/