From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261962AbTDHRnN (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 13:43:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261966AbTDHRnN (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 13:43:13 -0400 Received: from siaag1ad.compuserve.com ([149.174.40.6]:23530 "EHLO siaag1ad.compuserve.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261962AbTDHRnK (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 13:43:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 13:52:01 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone To: Larry McVoy Cc: linux-kernel Message-ID: <200304081354_MC3-1-3386-1A33@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> >> >> Have you looked at Stellation at all? I know the >> >> code itself is Java but they have some neat ideas about >> >> being able to take 'slices' across the repository and >> >> treat the slice as a single file for things like revision >> >> tracking. >> > >> > Except that those are ideas as far as I can tell, not actual code. >> >> Last I saw they had a prototype that worked better than they expected. > > Which you've installed and tried, right? Heh. The whole Eclipse/CDT/Stellation assemblage takes so much work just to get off the ground it's not even funny, not to mention their directions for putting Stellation on Oracle are curiously empty. > I just poked through their > website and I can't find anywhere in the code or docs where it says > they have the 'slices' idea implemented. They certainly talk about > it a lot. Did you look in the changelog? >> 1. Keep the csets separate but link them together. Let the developer >> tell the system whether one is an enhancement or a bugfix to the base. > > BK already does this. Can I somehow 'collapse' the csets together when browsing the repository? A nice example might be the recent ethernet padding fix, where there ended up being a whole set of separate patches. By looking through the comments I can piece together a complete patch, but it's painful. -- Chuck I am not a number!