From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262642AbTDHX4g (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:56:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262649AbTDHX4g (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:56:36 -0400 Received: from [12.47.58.221] ([12.47.58.221]:18163 "EHLO pao-ex01.pao.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262642AbTDHX4f (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:56:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 16:06:45 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 64-bit kdev_t - just for playing Message-Id: <20030408160645.04bb6112.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20030408195305.F19288@almesberger.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Apr 2003 00:08:08.0815 (UTC) FILETIME=[1A01FFF0:01C2FE2C] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > > dev_t is already 64 bits in glibc, and the glibc<->kernel interface > needs to be fixed *anyway*. We have to take the pain of migration, we > might as well go all the way. If I understand the words of Andries and Linus correctly, that is the plan.