From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262423AbTDIBNS (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:13:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262657AbTDIBNS (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:13:18 -0400 Received: from siaab1aa.compuserve.com ([149.174.40.1]:49389 "EHLO siaab1aa.compuserve.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262423AbTDIBNR (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:13:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:21:30 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] aic7* claims all checked EISA io ranges (was: [MAILER-DAEMON@rumms.u To: "Justin T. Gibbs" Cc: linux-kernel Message-ID: <200304082124_MC3-1-3399-FBD0@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Justin T. Gibbs wrote: >As far as the 2.4.X series is concerned, pushing has not helped. I've >seen spelling fixes and incorrorct changes get accepted from non >maintainers "instantly", while the maintainers changes are not accepted. And your code goes for long periods of time without merging good fixes, like this one (from 2.4.20): --- aic7-20030310/drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7770.c.orig Mon Mar 10 20:46:36 2003 +++ aic7-20030310/drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7770.c Tue Apr 8 20:45:20 2003 @ -314,7 +314,7 @ if (bootverbose) printf("%s: Reading SEEPROM...", ahc_name(ahc)); have_seeprom = ahc_read_seeprom(&sd, (uint16_t *)sc, - /*start_addr*/0, sizeof(sc)/2); + /*start_addr*/0, sizeof(*sc)/2); if (have_seeprom) { -- Chuck Can't we all just get along?