From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: 76306.1226@compuserve.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problem: 2.4.20, 2.5.66 have different IDE channel order
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 14:50:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030415145005.20383a70.rddunlap@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1050439381.28591.15.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
On 15 Apr 2003 21:43:02 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
| On Maw, 2003-04-15 at 19:33, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
| > Well, that matches what 2.4 does:
| >
| >
| > 00:0d.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371SB PIIX3 IDE [Natoma/Triton II]
| > 00:10.0 Unknown mass storage controller: Promise Technology, Inc. 20268 (rev 02)
| > 01:0b.0 Unknown mass storage controller: Triones Technologies, Inc. HPT366 / HPT370 (rev 03)
| >
| >
| > 2.5 nonmodular seems to be doing it in BIOS order -- the HPT370 BIOS
| > initializes before the Promise (and won't let it boot but I can deal
| > with that.) I'll probably replace it with a PDC20262 before looking
|
| Im a bit puzzled by this because it does look like a bug. Our pci scan code hasnt changed
| that materially. I assume the promise and hpt are both plug in cards >
but something also changed NIC interface ordering (according to davej et al)...
so maybe it's deep inside PCI bus scanning.
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-15 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-15 18:33 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-15 20:43 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-15 21:50 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-17 8:43 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-15 0:51 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-15 11:23 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030415145005.20383a70.rddunlap@osdl.org \
--to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®