From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264187AbTDPB1w (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 21:27:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264189AbTDPB1w (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 21:27:52 -0400 Received: from adsl-67-121-155-183.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net ([67.121.155.183]:8416 "EHLO triplehelix.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264187AbTDPB1v (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 21:27:51 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 18:39:42 -0700 To: kernel@kolivas.org Cc: linux-kernel mailing list Subject: [2.4.20-ck6] Rmap15f patch fails in vmscan.c Message-ID: <20030416013942.GA31943@triplehelix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Joshua Kwan Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The subject says it all. Extracted a clean 2.4.20 tree, patched it with the full -ck6 patch, then applied the rmap15f patch, and it fails in mm/vmscan.c. Give it a try for yourself... :) (The reason why I haven't just fixed it myself is because the rejects file is really big, and it seems to me like something you can easily correct with your sources, by rediffing against the right version of the file or something.) Regards Josh --=20 New PGP public key: 0x27AFC3EE --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+nLReT2bz5yevw+4RAuNYAJ47PB4BBE+NH4JtWQFZthIvt3zlOQCgs01v 2TlrzFAo9LOjv/Y3PIUP3rE= =TCTz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--