From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264276AbTDPJmN (for ); Wed, 16 Apr 2003 05:42:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264277AbTDPJmN (for ); Wed, 16 Apr 2003 05:42:13 -0400 Received: from siaab1aa.compuserve.com ([149.174.40.1]:29589 "EHLO siaab1aa.compuserve.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264276AbTDPJmM (for ); Wed, 16 Apr 2003 05:42:12 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 05:45:20 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: DMA transfers in 2.5.67 To: Mens Rullgerd Cc: linux-kernel , Alan Cox Message-ID: <200304160548_MC3-1-349F-E844@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Btw, I just noticed that hard disk throughput is much lower with 2.5 > than 2.4. With 2.4.21-pre5 I get ~40 MB/s, but with 2.5.67 the speed > drops to 25-30 MB/s. Everything according to hdparm. Is it possible > that DMA is generally slow for some reason? I am seeing that too, with IDE hardware. And 2.4.20aa1 is even faster: # mount /ext3_fs # time dd if=/ext3_fs/100MiB_file of=/dev/null bs=32k 2.4.20aa1 : 3.3 sec (exactly what I expect to see) 2.5.66 : 6.6 sec -- Chuck