From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264252AbTDPHY7 (for ); Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:24:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264253AbTDPHY7 (for ); Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:24:59 -0400 Received: from amalthea.dnx.de ([193.108.181.146]:14560 "HELO amalthea.dnx.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S264252AbTDPHY6 (for ); Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:24:58 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 09:36:35 +0200 From: Robert Schwebel To: David Brownell Cc: linux-usb-devel , Greg KH , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Chosing the right Linux "USB Gadget" API and Driver Framework Message-ID: <20030416073635.GA10886@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (/) X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *195hT9-0001DB-00*cDa1wprUHyY* Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm currently working on support for the USB gadget controller inside the Intel PXA25x XScale processor. David Brownell has recently published a new USB gadget API which was discussed on linux-usb-devel and which seems to be a good starting point. As there is at least one other API (by Belcarra, former Lineo code) I'm wondering what Greg's and Linus' position concerning the new USB gadget API is. A comment from your side would be welcome. Cheers, Robert -- Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry