From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263519AbTDTDbq (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Apr 2003 23:31:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263520AbTDTDbp (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Apr 2003 23:31:45 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:42400 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263519AbTDTDbp (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Apr 2003 23:31:45 -0400 Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 20:35:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20030419.203543.112604079.davem@redhat.com> To: yoshfuji@wide.ad.jp Cc: latten@austin.ibm.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IPsecv6 integrity failures not dropped From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20030419.115053.123574563.yoshfuji@wide.ad.jp> References: <200304182017.h3IKH4ng019821@faith.austin.ibm.com> <20030419.115053.123574563.yoshfuji@wide.ad.jp> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 11:50:53 +0900 (JST) just change u8 nexthdr = 0 to int nexthdr = 0, in xfrm6_rcv() is fine, isn't it? That's exactly the most correct fix, applied to my tree. Thanks.