From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263309AbTDRXqk (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2003 19:46:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263311AbTDRXqk (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2003 19:46:40 -0400 Received: from pgramoul.net2.nerim.net ([80.65.227.234]:52352 "EHLO philou.aspic.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263309AbTDRXqj (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2003 19:46:39 -0400 Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 01:58:36 +0200 From: Philippe =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Gramoull=E9?= To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 2.5.67-mm4 & IRQ balancing Message-Id: <20030419015836.6acbaeb6.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> Organization: Lycos Europe X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11claws87 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Importance: high X-Priority: 1 (Highest) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, It may be not related to -mm4 only but as i hadn't checked before ( with 2.5.x kernels), I just wonder about /proc/interrupts output: $ cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 CPU1 0: 47851610 0 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 51789 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 2: 0 0 XT-PIC cascade 3: 171 0 IO-APIC-edge serial 8: 772066 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc 12: 3 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042, i8042, i8042, i8042 15: 58 1 IO-APIC-edge ide1 16: 47047 0 IO-APIC-level ohci1394 18: 391753 0 IO-APIC-level EMU10K1 19: 911863 0 IO-APIC-level uhci-hcd 20: 261806 0 IO-APIC-level eth0 22: 273648 0 IO-APIC-level aic7xxx 23: 0 0 IO-APIC-level uhci-hcd NMI: 47853468 47852927 LOC: 47860500 47860630 ERR: 0 MIS: 0 Shouldn't the interrupts be balanced on both CPUs ? DELL MT 530 Ws , SMP Xeon 1.5Ghz, 512 Mo RAM on Debian Unstable. Thanks, Philippe