From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263986AbTDWIPg (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2003 04:15:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263987AbTDWIPg (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2003 04:15:36 -0400 Received: from us02smtp1.synopsys.com ([198.182.60.75]:1023 "HELO vaxjo.synopsys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263986AbTDWIPf (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2003 04:15:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 10:27:27 +0200 From: Alex Riesen To: Patrick Mochel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 2.5.86+: sizes of almost all files in sysfs are 4k? Message-ID: <20030423082727.GE890@riesen-pc.gr05.synopsys.com> Reply-To: alexander.riesen@synopsys.COM Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Synopsys, Inc. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This confuses some applications (i.e., the midnight commander). Was this intended? If the size is not simple/possible to calculate, maybe using 0 would be an option for the cases where the size doesn't carry any information (like in procfs)? -alex