From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S263394AbTDYQMj (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 25 Apr 2003 12:12:39 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263413AbTDYQMd
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 25 Apr 2003 12:12:33 -0400
Received: from [80.190.48.67] ([80.190.48.67]:12806 "EHLO
	mx00.linux-systeme.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S263394AbTDYQM2 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 25 Apr 2003 12:12:28 -0400
From: Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de>
Organization: Working Overloaded Linux Kernel
To: Zed Pobre <zed@resonant.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.21-rc1
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 18:24:11 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1
References: <Pine.LNX.4.53L.0304211545580.12940@freak.distro.conectiva> <20030425161927.GA31922@singularity.resonant.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030425161927.GA31922@singularity.resonant.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200304251824.11724.m.c.p@wolk-project.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Friday 25 April 2003 18:19, Zed Pobre wrote:

Hi Zed,

> I remember that someone at some point had an alternative VM
> implementation that was supposed to correct this problem.  Does anyone
> know who that was and if there are any patches that would apply
> against 2.4.21-rc1?
rmap ... http://www.surriel.com/patches/

ciao, Marc