From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261364AbTD1Wm2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2003 18:42:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261367AbTD1Wm2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2003 18:42:28 -0400 Received: from [12.47.58.171] ([12.47.58.171]:28457 "EHLO pao-ex01.pao.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261364AbTD1Wm1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2003 18:42:27 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 15:51:53 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "Bryan O'Sullivan" Cc: ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make struct alt_instr acceptable to userland Message-Id: <20030428155153.44c3976d.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <1051570042.12949.67.camel@serpentine.internal.keyresearch.com> References: <1051570042.12949.67.camel@serpentine.internal.keyresearch.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Apr 2003 22:54:39.0940 (UTC) FILETIME=[26601040:01C30DD9] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Bryan O'Sullivan" wrote: > > Andi's new struct alt_instr is visible to klibc. The attached patch > changes the types it uses, so that klibc becomes happy. Should it be inside #ifdef __KERNEL__?