From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261296AbTD2JcS (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 05:32:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261300AbTD2JcS (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 05:32:18 -0400 Received: from pop.gmx.de ([213.165.64.20]:56056 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261296AbTD2JcR (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 05:32:17 -0400 From: Karl Weigel To: Roman Zippel Subject: linux-2.5.68-bk8: Problem with "make xconfig" Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:27:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304291127.39758.xml-22047@gmx.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Roman, I have difficulties with configuring the kernel with "make xconfig": g++ -Wp,-MD,scripts/kconfig/.qconf.o.d -O2 -I/usr/lib/qt3/include -c -o scripts/kconfig/qconf.o scripts/kconfig/qconf.cc scripts/kconfig/qconf.cc: In destructor `virtual ConfigItem::~ConfigItem()': scripts/kconfig/qconf.cc:291: error: non-lvalue in unary `&' make[1]: *** [scripts/kconfig/qconf.o] Fehler 1 make: *** [scripts/kconfig/qconf] Fehler 2 After changing the offending line, it did compile and I was able to configure the kernel. However, I am not really sure, whether this change is correct: --- scripts/kconfig/qconf.cc~ 2003-03-17 22:43:38.000000000 +0100 +++ scripts/kconfig/qconf.cc 2003-04-29 11:07:57.000000000 +0200 @@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ ConfigItem::~ConfigItem(void) { if (menu) { - ConfigItem** ip = &(ConfigItem*)menu->data; + ConfigItem** ip = (ConfigItem**)&(menu->data); for (; *ip; ip = &(*ip)->nextItem) { if (*ip == this) { *ip = nextItem; My environment is SuSE Linux 8.2 and GCC 3.3 g++ --version g++ (GCC) 3.3 20030226 (prerelease) (SuSE Linux) Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. I would like to know, whether this modification would be correct with you. Regards Karl