From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261892AbTD2MXF (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 08:23:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261884AbTD2MXE (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 08:23:04 -0400 Received: from carisma.slowglass.com ([195.224.96.167]:2835 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261876AbTD2MXA (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 08:23:00 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 13:35:16 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Chandrasekhar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Stack Trace dump in do_IRQ Message-ID: <20030429133516.A29248@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Chandrasekhar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from chandrasekhar.nagaraj@patni.com on Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 06:04:28PM +0530 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 06:04:28PM +0530, Chandrasekhar wrote: > Hi All, > We have a custom driver which runs on Red Hat Advanced Server 2.1(kernel > version 2.4.9-e.3). In general please report bugs for vendor kernels to their repective vnedors - the RH AS kernels have forked from mainline 2.4 more than 1 1/2 years ago so they are very different from any official kernel. > dont have the same check? Also, if the stack overflow can cause future > problems, then > how can we increase the stack size? Thanks in advance for any information on > this. I'd suggest fixing the driver instead :) and btw, a similar debugging check is merged in recent mainline kernels.