From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262354AbTD3Tna (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:43:30 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262357AbTD3Tna
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:43:30 -0400
Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:46753 "EHLO
	www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262354AbTD3Tn3
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:43:29 -0400
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 20:55:49 +0100
From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
To: Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Why DRM exists [was Re: Flame Linus to a crisp!]
Message-ID: <20030430195549.GV10374@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
References: <170EBA504C3AD511A3FE00508BB89A9202032941@exnanycmbx4.ipc.com> <20030430152041.GA22038@work.bitmover.com> <3EB013A1.9030301@techsource.com> <200304301920.h3UJKE5J007310@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <3EB026D8.2070508@techsource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3EB026D8.2070508@techsource.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 03:41:12PM -0400, Timothy Miller wrote:
 
> I am vaguely familiar with that.  It uses vi-like editing commands? 
> Sounds great.  Why isn't THAT the default shell?  Why are these 
> usability perks not a priority to commercial vendors?  Why are they a 
> priority for open source developers?

... and for $64000 question, could you get yourself vaguely familiar with
the notion of on-topic posting?