From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262737AbTEGB6b (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2003 21:58:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262739AbTEGB6b (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2003 21:58:31 -0400 Received: from palrel13.hp.com ([156.153.255.238]:25028 "EHLO palrel13.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262737AbTEGB6a (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2003 21:58:30 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 19:10:53 -0700 To: Greg KH Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Wireless drivers in 2.5.69 Message-ID: <20030507021053.GA13661@bougret.hpl.hp.com> Reply-To: jt@hpl.hp.com References: <20030506041929.GA5564@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030506041929.GA5564@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Organisation: HP Labs Palo Alto Address: HP Labs, 1U-17, 1501 Page Mill road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. E-mail: jt@hpl.hp.com From: Jean Tourrilhes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 09:19:29PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > Hi, > > You mentioned in your changes to the wireless core for 2.5.68 that you > had sent updates for the various drivers to the different driver > maintainers. As it looks like your changes made it into 2.5.69, but the > driver updates didn't, do you have a pointer to these updates so that > those of us with now non-working wireless cards can test them out? > > Specifically, in my case I'm looking for the updates for the orinoco_pci > driver, as that has stopped working in 2.5.69, but was working just fine > in 2.5.68. > > thanks, > > greg k-h I don't mind taking the blame when it's my fault, but this is one case where you will need to find another culprit ;-) 1) My changes were fully backward compatible and tested with old/unmodified drivers. 2) My changes are not included in 2.5.69 (Jeff will confirm that). Without a more detailed bug report, it's difficult to pin-point the blame, and I didn't personally had time to test 2.5.69. Arnaldo made some trivial changes to wireless.c, but I don't believe that's broken. There is of course the irq handler stuff... Good luck, and keep me posted ;-) Jean